You run the nonprofit. You write the grants. You also answer the email, pay the vendors, and drive the van. GrantIntel drafts the full seven-section proposal in four minutes — so you can finish the application before your kid wakes up, make the deadline you almost missed, and still get to bed before midnight. One person. Thirty grants a year. No team required.
You don't need another database of grants. You need the actual application written — calibrated to what the funder has historically rewarded, ready to submit before the deadline you almost missed.
Three layers. Each one designed to remove a specific failure mode that costs you grants every cycle.
Click "Start application." The draft generates in real time — executive summary, statement of need, project description, evaluation plan, budget narrative, organizational capacity, logic model. Every section is structured with quantitative evidence first, because that's where reviewers are looking when scoring under time pressure. The draft references your actual programs and outcome data. It reads like a grants writer who has known your organization for years. 73% of members submit with under 30 minutes of editing from the AI first draft.
The pipeline board tracks every active pursuit — status, deadline countdown, draft strength, team assignment, version history — in a single view. Alerts fire at 45, 21, and 7 days per grant. At 7 days, the system prompts a go/no-go decision: commit or archive. The compliance gate runs before every submission — word counts, attachments, SAM registration, budget arithmetic — and the submit button stays disabled until every critical check passes. Technical rejections, which account for over 30% of preventable losses, stop here.
This is the layer that creates the moat. Funded proposals reinforce the language patterns, evidence structures, and section priorities that produced the award. Declined proposals trigger divergence analysis — identifying which sections underperformed relative to funded norms for this specific program. Over 12–18 months the system develops a behavioral model of every funder you've worked with: not what their guidelines say they value, but what their award history demonstrates they reward. This model improves every grant cycle. Organizations that start earlier compound an advantage that cannot be replicated by later adopters — ever.
You can't afford a $94,000 grant writer. You were never going to hire one. The real cost of grant writing isn't a line item in your budget — it's the hours of your life you spend on it. Here's what you're actually paying, and what you'd pay instead.
Built from interviews with 200+ development directors. Every capability traces back to a specific failure mode that cost a real organization a real grant.
Full seven-section proposal generated from your organization's program library and the funder's award history. Reviewer-calibrated language. Quantitative evidence prioritized. The first draft is closer to submission-ready than any human first draft you've ever read.
Every grant your org qualifies for, surfaced at least 60 days before the deadline. Filtered by sector, geography, award size, and your historical win patterns. You stop discovering deadlines on Tuesday for the Friday submission.
Mandatory pre-submission scan: word counts, all required attachments present and non-expired, SAM registration active, budget arithmetic balances. Submit button stays disabled until every critical check passes. Technical rejections — 30%+ of all preventable losses — end here permanently.
Behavioral model of 847 funders built from 14,200+ analyzed awards. Not what their guidelines claim — what their award history demonstrates. The asymmetric edge is knowing what reviewers actually score, not what they say they score.
Section strength scores update live as you edit. Specific improvement suggestions, not generic AI-speak. Style preserved across rewrites. The output reads like your organization wrote it — because it did.
Submission guides for grants.gov, SAM, Foundation Directory, Instrumentl, Submittable, and 9 more. Documented edge cases, browser quirks, character-limit traps. Your team submits without surprises at 11:55pm on the deadline.
The shift isn't incremental. EDs describe it the same way: the economics of the development operation change.
Public launch pricing kicks in once the founding cohort closes. Members who join now lock today's rate permanently — no renewal increases, ever.
Discover grants and test the engine on a single application. Use it to see whether the output meets your bar before paying for anything.
The replacement for a $100K grant writer. Unlimited drafting, full pipeline management, complete funder intelligence. The economics shift here.
For multi-affiliate networks, statewide associations, and organizations running development across 10+ programs or sites.
Founding members lock in $450/month — permanently. No team, no hires, no consultants. Just one person, thirty grants a year, and a bedtime that's actually reasonable.